Young people and family members engaging across direct programmes, open access sessions, and coordinated supports.
Evidence rooted in young people and place.
This page brings together the measures, stories, and annual accountability points that show how Ionad Oige Bhearna/Na Bhforbacha turns community investment into safer participation, stronger wellbeing, and visible local leadership.
What our reporting is designed to show.
We report on more than raw attendance. Each review cycle tracks who is being reached, what changes for participants, where demand is increasing, and how governance and funding decisions support long-term quality.
Participants sustaining attendance across a full programme cycle or term-based intervention.
Contributed by peer leaders, trustees, facilitators, and community supporters during the reporting year.
Average time from referral to first meaningful contact for structured support pathways.
Seven images, one connected story of participation.
The visual record matters because it shows the settings where outcomes happen: youth spaces, community gathering points, outreach environments, and moments where confidence turns into contribution.
Open access spaces that lower barriers to entry.
Informal participation remains one of the strongest predictors of later engagement in structured programmes, especially for young people testing trust for the first time.
Group activity that builds belonging and routine.
Regular contact creates the conditions for safer peer relationships, better attendance, and stronger continuity between staff, families, and participants.
Visible youth voice in local community life.
When young people are part of planning, presenting, and leading, outcomes expand beyond service use into responsibility, confidence, and civic presence.
Shared events that strengthen intergenerational trust.
Family-facing and community-facing activities give stakeholders direct sight of the work, making accountability more tangible than a document alone.
Local places remain part of the evidence base.
Our reports situate impact in the real environments where young people travel, gather, learn, and reconnect.
Place-based work shapes programme design.
Geography, transport, and local identity all affect how participation is built and how support is sustained.
Community context keeps reporting grounded.
Impact is strongest when statistics, practitioner insight, and local context are read together rather than in isolation.
Four domains used to assess change.
Each domain combines participation data with practitioner observation, participant voice, and partner feedback so impact can be interpreted with more precision.
Participants reporting a stronger sense of inclusion and a trusted place to return to each week.
Young people showing improved coping, confidence, or emotional regulation by programme close.
Participants moving into leadership, further programmes, volunteering, or more stable school engagement.
Average feedback from parents and carers on communication, responsiveness, and the safety of services.
How evidence is gathered, reviewed, and used.
The purpose of reporting is service improvement. Data collection is only useful if it leads to better decisions, clearer safeguarding oversight, and more responsive programme delivery.
Decision-making informed by evidence.
Attendance and feedback data are used to adjust scheduling, group size, referral criteria, and staffing intensity.
Case-note trends and incident reporting are reviewed to strengthen supervision, escalation routes, and training priorities.
Trustees receive concise dashboard reporting linking outcomes, finance, participation, and operational risk.
Impact summaries support funder reporting while preserving a clear line between restricted funding and programme delivery.
A short public view of growth and stewardship.
Financial reporting on this page is intentionally simple. It gives a public-facing snapshot of service growth, programme spend, and the discipline required to protect quality as demand rises.
0.84 / 0.72
1.01 / 0.88
1.23 / 1.12
1.39 / 1.28
Short examples behind the headline figures.
The strongest reports balance metrics with narrative evidence. These short examples show how individual change, family engagement, and local partnership intersect in practice.
Attendance improved when support became relational and consistent.
A young person referred through school attendance concerns moved from low engagement into steady weekly participation after mentoring, check-ins at home, and a more manageable programme pathway were agreed.
Peer leadership translated into stronger retention and ownership.
Once young people were given visible responsibilities in planning and delivery, volunteer continuity improved and group culture became more stable across the term.
Creative presentation offered a practical route back into confidence.
A participant who had withdrawn from group settings re-engaged through a creative storytelling strand, eventually choosing to present work publicly with peer support and staff preparation.
How to request detailed reports or governance material.
If you need the full annual impact review, funder-facing reporting extracts, or governance documentation, the organisation can route your request to the appropriate contact quickly.
Request annual impact packs, summary dashboards, or outcome evidence aligned to funded strands.
oisin.kennedy@ionadoigebhearnanabhforbacha.clickRequest programme evidence, referral pathway information, or partnership reporting relevant to local supports.
info@ionadoigebhearnanabhforbacha.orgAsk for public-facing updates, event summaries, or information on how local feedback informs planning.
info@ionadoigebhearnanabhforbacha.org